Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She identifies e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various options available for teens in light to the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
The majority of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, and this makes it hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths each year are because of smoking. This figure is likely an underestimation, since many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. It also assumes that folks who smoke don’t intend to achieve this.
The author suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from this is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, if they are.
However, it’s important to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to obtain the same effect as smoking cigarettes, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing offers a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers could be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. It also means that they are taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points about the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies must not be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the amount of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the unwanted effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports about the negative unwanted effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have plenty of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been an important factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past few years.
The author does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t seem to consider the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the theory that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we have to do to beat cigarettes is to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so because of other health issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are lots of reasons why people smoke. The writer has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it is true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a few of the chemicals found in cigarette smoking are located in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the fact that all we must do to solve the issue of smoking is JUUL Pods to decrease the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not located in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the number of chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health and wellness. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.